<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beware of Andy Beard&#8217;s Stumbles!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/</link>
	<description>Musings About Affiliate Marketing and Blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: StumbleUpon Has Longest Traffic Surfing Ratio. Become A Power Stumbler! &#124; Anthony Jude Lawrence Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>StumbleUpon Has Longest Traffic Surfing Ratio. Become A Power Stumbler! &#124; Anthony Jude Lawrence Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-606</guid>
		<description>[...] Because you stroked their ego [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Because you stroked their ego [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 25 Reasons You Get Thumbs Up &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>25 Reasons You Get Thumbs Up &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-605</guid>
		<description>[...] Because you stroked their ego [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Because you stroked their ego [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is being Stumbled the new Slashdotted? &#8212; Keiron&#8217;s Window to Madness</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-604</link>
		<dc:creator>Is being Stumbled the new Slashdotted? &#8212; Keiron&#8217;s Window to Madness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-604</guid>
		<description>[...] Vlad @ Affiliate Journey on the other hand had the experience of being Stumbled by Andy Beard, which led to him receiving 500 visitors in 10 minutes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vlad @ Affiliate Journey on the other hand had the experience of being Stumbled by Andy Beard, which led to him receiving 500 visitors in 10 minutes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy (Another one)</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy (Another one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-603</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with the thumbs down button. I would prefer to be an Ignore function for that user so the page is not served again. I know I&#039;ve thumbed down one or two things but I still get them served from time to time and that was the only reason I thumbed it down, so I didn&#039;t get to see it again which is how I thought it worked? Obviously not.
Personally, I don&#039;t like rejecting anything out of hand unless it something really nasty. What stumbleupon needs is the current thumbs up - Hey! Look at this guys, I like it! - The thumbs down - Nope! Sorry I don&#039;t like it (But that doesn&#039;t mean that the article is then buried - others may like it - in fact I don&#039;t agree that an article should be buried at all) plus an extra button - Ignore or &#039;Seen That&#039; - OK! I&#039;ve seen that like 20-30 times already, lay of a while ok?
That way others get to see a page even if it has been thumbed down and no special rating is given to a page either way. If a user then doesn&#039;t want to see the page again, they hit the ignore button and that user doesn&#039;t get to see it again. Simple enough to do really.
Anyway just my slant on it. Just because one person doesn&#039;t like something doesn&#039;t mean others will dislike it and vice versa. It needs the third option IMHO and that goes with all social bookmarking sites in a way. That third option though should only be user specific and not associated with the rating of an article in any way. I see that as being way more fair in operation.
hmm maybe an idea for starting up a new social bookmarking site with a different approach - a Fair one.
nb: No nicking my idea now lol ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with the thumbs down button. I would prefer to be an Ignore function for that user so the page is not served again. I know I&#8217;ve thumbed down one or two things but I still get them served from time to time and that was the only reason I thumbed it down, so I didn&#8217;t get to see it again which is how I thought it worked? Obviously not.<br />
Personally, I don&#8217;t like rejecting anything out of hand unless it something really nasty. What stumbleupon needs is the current thumbs up &#8211; Hey! Look at this guys, I like it! &#8211; The thumbs down &#8211; Nope! Sorry I don&#8217;t like it (But that doesn&#8217;t mean that the article is then buried &#8211; others may like it &#8211; in fact I don&#8217;t agree that an article should be buried at all) plus an extra button &#8211; Ignore or &#8216;Seen That&#8217; &#8211; OK! I&#8217;ve seen that like 20-30 times already, lay of a while ok?<br />
That way others get to see a page even if it has been thumbed down and no special rating is given to a page either way. If a user then doesn&#8217;t want to see the page again, they hit the ignore button and that user doesn&#8217;t get to see it again. Simple enough to do really.<br />
Anyway just my slant on it. Just because one person doesn&#8217;t like something doesn&#8217;t mean others will dislike it and vice versa. It needs the third option IMHO and that goes with all social bookmarking sites in a way. That third option though should only be user specific and not associated with the rating of an article in any way. I see that as being way more fair in operation.<br />
hmm maybe an idea for starting up a new social bookmarking site with a different approach &#8211; a Fair one.<br />
nb: No nicking my idea now lol <img src='http://sageblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy (Another one)</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-5232</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy (Another one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-5232</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with the thumbs down button. I would prefer to be an Ignore function for that user so the page is not served again. I know I&#039;ve thumbed down one or two things but I still get them served from time to time and that was the only reason I thumbed it down, so I didn&#039;t get to see it again which is how I thought it worked? Obviously not.&lt;br&gt;Personally, I don&#039;t like rejecting anything out of hand unless it something really nasty. What stumbleupon needs is the current thumbs up - Hey! Look at this guys, I like it! - The thumbs down - Nope! Sorry I don&#039;t like it (But that doesn&#039;t mean that the article is then buried - others may like it - in fact I don&#039;t agree that an article should be buried at all) plus an extra button - Ignore or &#039;Seen That&#039; - OK! I&#039;ve seen that like 20-30 times already, lay of a while ok?&lt;br&gt;That way others get to see a page even if it has been thumbed down and no special rating is given to a page either way. If a user then doesn&#039;t want to see the page again, they hit the ignore button and that user doesn&#039;t get to see it again. Simple enough to do really.&lt;br&gt;Anyway just my slant on it. Just because one person doesn&#039;t like something doesn&#039;t mean others will dislike it and vice versa. It needs the third option IMHO and that goes with all social bookmarking sites in a way. That third option though should only be user specific and not associated with the rating of an article in any way. I see that as being way more fair in operation.&lt;br&gt;hmm maybe an idea for starting up a new social bookmarking site with a different approach - a Fair one.&lt;br&gt;nb: No nicking my idea now lol ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not sure I agree with the thumbs down button. I would prefer to be an Ignore function for that user so the page is not served again. I know I&#39;ve thumbed down one or two things but I still get them served from time to time and that was the only reason I thumbed it down, so I didn&#39;t get to see it again which is how I thought it worked? Obviously not.<br />Personally, I don&#39;t like rejecting anything out of hand unless it something really nasty. What stumbleupon needs is the current thumbs up &#8211; Hey! Look at this guys, I like it! &#8211; The thumbs down &#8211; Nope! Sorry I don&#39;t like it (But that doesn&#39;t mean that the article is then buried &#8211; others may like it &#8211; in fact I don&#39;t agree that an article should be buried at all) plus an extra button &#8211; Ignore or &#39;Seen That&#39; &#8211; OK! I&#39;ve seen that like 20-30 times already, lay of a while ok?<br />That way others get to see a page even if it has been thumbed down and no special rating is given to a page either way. If a user then doesn&#39;t want to see the page again, they hit the ignore button and that user doesn&#39;t get to see it again. Simple enough to do really.<br />Anyway just my slant on it. Just because one person doesn&#39;t like something doesn&#39;t mean others will dislike it and vice versa. It needs the third option IMHO and that goes with all social bookmarking sites in a way. That third option though should only be user specific and not associated with the rating of an article in any way. I see that as being way more fair in operation.<br />hmm maybe an idea for starting up a new social bookmarking site with a different approach &#8211; a Fair one.<br />nb: No nicking my idea now lol <img src='http://sageblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krotzyk</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>krotzyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Congrats! I have received some stumbles which gave just about 500 visitors in 30 minutes. My own profile generates just about 100-200 visitors but I hope my profile gets bigger soon :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats! I have received some stumbles which gave just about 500 visitors in 30 minutes. My own profile generates just about 100-200 visitors but I hope my profile gets bigger soon <img src='http://sageblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krotzyk</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>krotzyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>Congrats! I have received some stumbles which gave just about 500 visitors in 30 minutes. My own profile generates just about 100-200 visitors but I hope my profile gets bigger soon :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats! I have received some stumbles which gave just about 500 visitors in 30 minutes. My own profile generates just about 100-200 visitors but I hope my profile gets bigger soon <img src='http://sageblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>That was a negative review, not a thumb down - thumb downs are not visible

I just marked the negative review as not being useful, because it wasn&#039;t

Whilst this post is quite sort, there is useful information in it for people interested in this kind of content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a negative review, not a thumb down &#8211; thumb downs are not visible</p>
<p>I just marked the negative review as not being useful, because it wasn&#8217;t</p>
<p>Whilst this post is quite sort, there is useful information in it for people interested in this kind of content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Lord Matt,

I thought this was going to last because Andy Stumbled this post was well. However I also know the power of &quot;thumb down&quot; on Stumble ;). Just got one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lord Matt,</p>
<p>I thought this was going to last because Andy Stumbled this post was well. However I also know the power of &#8220;thumb down&#8221; on Stumble <img src='http://sageblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Just got one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/comment-page-1/#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/beware-of-andy-beards-stumbles/#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>That was a negative review, not a thumb down - thumb downs are not visible&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just marked the negative review as not being useful, because it wasn&#039;t&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whilst this post is quite sort, there is useful information in it for people interested in this kind of content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a negative review, not a thumb down &#8211; thumb downs are not visible</p>
<p>I just marked the negative review as not being useful, because it wasn&#39;t</p>
<p>Whilst this post is quite sort, there is useful information in it for people interested in this kind of content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
