<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial</title> <atom:link href="http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/</link> <description>Musings About Affiliate Marketing and Blogging</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 05:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Vlad</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1040</link> <dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1040</guid> <description>Gary,
I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.
For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.
Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p><p>I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.</p><p>For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.</p><p>Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gary</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link> <dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1039</guid> <description>Vlad,
Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad,</p><p>Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vlad</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link> <dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:46:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-4604</guid> <description>Gary,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p><p>I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.</p><p>For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.</p><p>Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gary</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link> <dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:30:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-4605</guid> <description>Vlad,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad,</p><p>Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vlad</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link> <dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1038</guid> <description>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vlad</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4606</link> <dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-4606</guid> <description>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: links for 2007-11-22 &#124; ChillyCool Web Digger</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link> <dc:creator>links for 2007-11-22 &#124; ChillyCool Web Digger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1037</guid> <description>[...] Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial &#124; My Affiliate Journey - Affiliate Marketing Blog ... Vlad&#8217;s review of the Content Spooling Network - article marketing and ghost writing services [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial | My Affiliate Journey &#8211; Affiliate Marketing Blog &#8230; Vlad&#8217;s review of the Content Spooling Network &#8211; article marketing and ghost writing services [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vlad</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link> <dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:33:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1036</guid> <description>&quot;that exact copy of an article goes all the directories&quot;
What I wanted to say is:
&lt;b&gt;that exact copy of an article does not go all the directories&lt;/b&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that exact copy of an article goes all the directories&#8221;</p><p>What I wanted to say is:</p><p><b>that exact copy of an article does not go all the directories</b></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vlad</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link> <dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:16:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1035</guid> <description>I am not in favor of rewriting articles either. It is offered there in order to use their automated submission function so that exact copy of an article goes all the directories.
I really think that $5.20 for a good article is a steal. I personally only had experience with EzineArticles in the past. The problem that I had with article directories was that I could have been spending that time on either improving my existing websites or simply write articles for this blog.
I think in combination with Hittail it can actually produce some remarkable results.... Now that I am back in Google ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not in favor of rewriting articles either. It is offered there in order to use their automated submission function so that exact copy of an article goes all the directories.</p><p>I really think that $5.20 for a good article is a steal. I personally only had experience with EzineArticles in the past. The problem that I had with article directories was that I could have been spending that time on either improving my existing websites or simply write articles for this blog.</p><p>I think in combination with Hittail it can actually produce some remarkable results&#8230;. Now that I am back in Google <img
src='http://sageblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy Beard</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link> <dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:07:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1034</guid> <description>This kind of thing is good for promoting niche sites where you don&#039;t want to invest too much personal time. I must admit I have never been a huge fan of any kind of article rewriting, either automatically or rotating human written phrases around.
I am sure the articles are currently effective for most directories.
The biggest problem is that most article sites these days have very little juice and so many articles. There is a real need to pump out a lot of articles to have any large benefits.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of thing is good for promoting niche sites where you don&#8217;t want to invest too much personal time. I must admit I have never been a huge fan of any kind of article rewriting, either automatically or rotating human written phrases around.</p><p>I am sure the articles are currently effective for most directories.</p><p>The biggest problem is that most article sites these days have very little juice and so many articles. There is a real need to pump out a lot of articles to have any large benefits.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
