<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/</link>
	<description>Musings About Affiliate Marketing and Blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>Gary,

I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.

For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.

Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.</p>
<p>For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.</p>
<p>Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Vlad,

Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad,</p>
<p>Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4604</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-4604</guid>
		<description>Gary,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>I really think you offer a great service. I was able to use Content Spooling Network for only few articles.</p>
<p>For me the price was the issue. I think if you offer some incentives to customers who would sign up for a yearly plan. I think $29 a month is quiet steep especially if you are charged additionally for each articles. To me $5 per article was not a problem but let say you would like to use Content Spooling Network for 4 unique articles a month that will amount to about $50 each month. Just a suggestion. It takes long time for article marketing to begin to snowball and some may wonder if the money were well spent.</p>
<p>Overall I am very impressed with what you have to offer. I may actually use it again in the future. For now, after changing some what the direction of this blog, I am unable to stay with Content Spooling Network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4605</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-4605</guid>
		<description>Vlad,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad,</p>
<p>Thank you for running this experiment. What was the result of that experiment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-4606</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-4606</guid>
		<description>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is any one subscribed to the comments on this post, could you please e-mail and let me know if you received notification about this comment? I have updated this blog to 2.3.1 version and of course as always most of my plugins are screwed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-11-22 &#124; ChillyCool Web Digger</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-11-22 &#124; ChillyCool Web Digger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>[...] Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial &#124; My Affiliate Journey - Affiliate Marketing Blog ... Vlad&#8217;s review of the Content Spooling Network - article marketing and ghost writing services [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Content Spooling Network Review: The 21 Day Trial | My Affiliate Journey &#8211; Affiliate Marketing Blog &#8230; Vlad&#8217;s review of the Content Spooling Network &#8211; article marketing and ghost writing services [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>&quot;that exact copy of an article goes all the directories&quot;

What I wanted to say is:

&lt;b&gt;that exact copy of an article does not go all the directories&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that exact copy of an article goes all the directories&#8221;</p>
<p>What I wanted to say is:</p>
<p><b>that exact copy of an article does not go all the directories</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>I am not in favor of rewriting articles either. It is offered there in order to use their automated submission function so that exact copy of an article goes all the directories.

I really think that $5.20 for a good article is a steal. I personally only had experience with EzineArticles in the past. The problem that I had with article directories was that I could have been spending that time on either improving my existing websites or simply write articles for this blog.

I think in combination with Hittail it can actually produce some remarkable results.... Now that I am back in Google ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not in favor of rewriting articles either. It is offered there in order to use their automated submission function so that exact copy of an article goes all the directories.</p>
<p>I really think that $5.20 for a good article is a steal. I personally only had experience with EzineArticles in the past. The problem that I had with article directories was that I could have been spending that time on either improving my existing websites or simply write articles for this blog.</p>
<p>I think in combination with Hittail it can actually produce some remarkable results&#8230;. Now that I am back in Google <img src='http://sageblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/content-spooling-network/#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>This kind of thing is good for promoting niche sites where you don&#039;t want to invest too much personal time. I must admit I have never been a huge fan of any kind of article rewriting, either automatically or rotating human written phrases around.

I am sure the articles are currently effective for most directories.

The biggest problem is that most article sites these days have very little juice and so many articles. There is a real need to pump out a lot of articles to have any large benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of thing is good for promoting niche sites where you don&#8217;t want to invest too much personal time. I must admit I have never been a huge fan of any kind of article rewriting, either automatically or rotating human written phrases around.</p>
<p>I am sure the articles are currently effective for most directories.</p>
<p>The biggest problem is that most article sites these days have very little juice and so many articles. There is a real need to pump out a lot of articles to have any large benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
