<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dot TV- More Keywords Rich Domanains?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/</link>
	<description>Musings About Affiliate Marketing and Blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ” awards. funny, weird, simple.</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>” awards. funny, weird, simple.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 05:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/#comment-567</guid>
		<description>[...] for Vlad. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Vlad. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Josh,

From what I understand any provider, or just about any provider will host a .tv domain, however only few web hosting providers are offering these domains. I am not sure if these domains will retain the value (i bought mine at $39 a piece). Again as the extension suggests this domain should be used for video blogging, and if people go on abusing the extension purely as an opportunity to grab some catchy and keywords rich domains it may turn out to be another .info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>From what I understand any provider, or just about any provider will host a .tv domain, however only few web hosting providers are offering these domains. I am not sure if these domains will retain the value (i bought mine at $39 a piece). Again as the extension suggests this domain should be used for video blogging, and if people go on abusing the extension purely as an opportunity to grab some catchy and keywords rich domains it may turn out to be another .info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/comment-page-1/#comment-5407</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/#comment-5407</guid>
		<description>Josh,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From what I understand any provider, or just about any provider will host a .tv domain, however only few web hosting providers are offering these domains. I am not sure if these domains will retain the value (i bought mine at $39 a piece). Again as the extension suggests this domain should be used for video blogging, and if people go on abusing the extension purely as an opportunity to grab some catchy and keywords rich domains it may turn out to be another .info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh,</p>
<p>From what I understand any provider, or just about any provider will host a .tv domain, however only few web hosting providers are offering these domains. I am not sure if these domains will retain the value (i bought mine at $39 a piece). Again as the extension suggests this domain should be used for video blogging, and if people go on abusing the extension purely as an opportunity to grab some catchy and keywords rich domains it may turn out to be another .info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/comment-page-1/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Do you mean many registrars don&#039;t offer .tv domains, or was that not a mistake in that  some hosting companies don&#039;t allow .tv domains to be hosted with them? If it&#039;s the latter, that&#039;s pretty crazy. If you pay your hosting fees, they shouldn&#039;t say anything about it. Unless maybe they think since it&#039;s a .tv it will be draining their bandwidth?

I honestly can&#039;t think of one popular .tv domain but with the way social media and video marketing is going, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me at all if .tv domains start getting much more popular in the very near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean many registrars don&#8217;t offer .tv domains, or was that not a mistake in that  some hosting companies don&#8217;t allow .tv domains to be hosted with them? If it&#8217;s the latter, that&#8217;s pretty crazy. If you pay your hosting fees, they shouldn&#8217;t say anything about it. Unless maybe they think since it&#8217;s a .tv it will be draining their bandwidth?</p>
<p>I honestly can&#8217;t think of one popular .tv domain but with the way social media and video marketing is going, it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me at all if .tv domains start getting much more popular in the very near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/comment-page-1/#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 05:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>Do you mean many registrars don&#039;t offer .tv domains, or was that not a mistake in that  some hosting companies don&#039;t allow .tv domains to be hosted with them? If it&#039;s the latter, that&#039;s pretty crazy. If you pay your hosting fees, they shouldn&#039;t say anything about it. Unless maybe they think since it&#039;s a .tv it will be draining their bandwidth?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I honestly can&#039;t think of one popular .tv domain but with the way social media and video marketing is going, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me at all if .tv domains start getting much more popular in the very near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean many registrars don&#39;t offer .tv domains, or was that not a mistake in that  some hosting companies don&#39;t allow .tv domains to be hosted with them? If it&#39;s the latter, that&#39;s pretty crazy. If you pay your hosting fees, they shouldn&#39;t say anything about it. Unless maybe they think since it&#39;s a .tv it will be draining their bandwidth?</p>
<p>I honestly can&#39;t think of one popular .tv domain but with the way social media and video marketing is going, it wouldn&#39;t surprise me at all if .tv domains start getting much more popular in the very near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs for Money</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/comment-page-1/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs for Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/#comment-564</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Even thought these domains are not cheap, actually it looks like they are among most expensive ones, there is very good chance to find a “keyword rich” domain name.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Makes sense - nobody wants them, and they&#039;re expensive, so few are sold. The problem with any non domain that isn&#039;t .com, there&#039;s a real danger of telling people your domain and them just remembering the &quot;name&quot; part, and ending up at someone elses site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even thought these domains are not cheap, actually it looks like they are among most expensive ones, there is very good chance to find a “keyword rich” domain name.</p></blockquote>
<p>Makes sense &#8211; nobody wants them, and they&#8217;re expensive, so few are sold. The problem with any non domain that isn&#8217;t .com, there&#8217;s a real danger of telling people your domain and them just remembering the &#8220;name&#8221; part, and ending up at someone elses site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs for Money</title>
		<link>http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/comment-page-1/#comment-5409</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs for Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/dot-tv-more-keywords-rich-domanains/#comment-5409</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Even thought these domains are not cheap, actually it looks like they are among most expensive ones, there is very good chance to find a “keyword rich” domain name.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Makes sense - nobody wants them, and they&#039;re expensive, so few are sold. The problem with any non domain that isn&#039;t .com, there&#039;s a real danger of telling people your domain and them just remembering the &quot;name&quot; part, and ending up at someone elses site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even thought these domains are not cheap, actually it looks like they are among most expensive ones, there is very good chance to find a “keyword rich” domain name.</p></blockquote>
<p>Makes sense &#8211; nobody wants them, and they&#39;re expensive, so few are sold. The problem with any non domain that isn&#39;t .com, there&#39;s a real danger of telling people your domain and them just remembering the &#8220;name&#8221; part, and ending up at someone elses site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.550 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-20 12:05:11 -->
