<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: FTC: &#8220;No Intention To Sue Bloggers&#8230;&#8221;</title> <atom:link href="http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/</link> <description>Musings About Affiliate Marketing and Blogging</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 05:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Mark Martinez</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-13599</link> <dc:creator>Mark Martinez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:36:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/?p=1310#comment-13599</guid> <description>I tend to think FTC would target bigger sites rather than tiny blogs. Think about sites promoting diet fads with bogus testimonials... all in all, no harm in full disclosure on a blog just to be on the safe side.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think FTC would target bigger sites rather than tiny blogs. Think about sites promoting diet fads with bogus testimonials&#8230; all in all, no harm in full disclosure on a blog just to be on the safe side.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe H</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-13538</link> <dc:creator>Joe H</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:53:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/?p=1310#comment-13538</guid> <description>Its interesting that 2 weeks after the deadline almost nothing has changed.  Look at the big affiliate review sites out there they have not changed a thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting that 2 weeks after the deadline almost nothing has changed.  Look at the big affiliate review sites out there they have not changed a thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Vlad Zablotskyy</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-13402</link> <dc:creator>Vlad Zablotskyy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:51:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/?p=1310#comment-13402</guid> <description>Andy thanks for heads up on the link- fixed!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy thanks for heads up on the link- fixed!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tweets that mention FTC: “No Intention To Sue Bloggers…” -- Topsy.com</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-13401</link> <dc:creator>Tweets that mention FTC: “No Intention To Sue Bloggers…” -- Topsy.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/?p=1310#comment-13401</guid> <description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Andy Beard and Vlad Zablotskyy, Vlad Zablotskyy. Vlad Zablotskyy said: New blog post: FTC: &quot;No Intention To Sue Bloggers...&quot; http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Andy Beard and Vlad Zablotskyy, Vlad Zablotskyy. Vlad Zablotskyy said: New blog post: FTC: &quot;No Intention To Sue Bloggers&#8230;&quot; <a
href="http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/" rel="nofollow">http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andy</title><link>http://sageblogger.com/ftc-no-intention-to-sue-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-13400</link> <dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:44:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sageblogger.com/?p=1310#comment-13400</guid> <description>Turning disclosure on its head and making it a benefit in some way is a much safer and potentially more profitable route.
note: link(s) broken</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turning disclosure on its head and making it a benefit in some way is a much safer and potentially more profitable route.<br
/> note: link(s) broken</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
