Comments on: So Who Is Evil? Ted Murphy or Mike Arrington? http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/ Musings About Affiliate Marketing and Blogging Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:49:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Vlad http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-474 Vlad Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:02:01 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-474 Tom, Thanks for stopping by. I did not realize there are "real" and "not real" bloggers. I thought there is those who belong to A-List and those who don't. :) On a serious note, I would really like to hear your definition of a "real blogger". Could you do me a favor? Tom,

Thanks for stopping by. I did not realize there are “real” and “not real” bloggers. I thought there is those who belong to A-List and those who don’t. :)

On a serious note, I would really like to hear your definition of a “real blogger”. Could you do me a favor?

]]> By: Vlad http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-6037 Vlad Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:02:01 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-6037 Tom,<br><br>Thanks for stopping by. I did not realize there are "real" and "not real" bloggers. I thought there is those who belong to A-List and those who don't. :)<br><br>On a serious note, I would really like to hear your definition of a "real blogger". Could you do me a favor? Tom,

Thanks for stopping by. I did not realize there are “real” and “not real” bloggers. I thought there is those who belong to A-List and those who don't. :)

On a serious note, I would really like to hear your definition of a “real blogger”. Could you do me a favor?

]]> By: Tom Paine http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-477 Tom Paine Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:24:27 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-477 Pay Per Post was never my cup of tea. Sorry for being so damn arrogant/rude or w.e but Pay Per Post doesnt really go on too well with the real bloggers.. Pay Per Post was never my cup of tea. Sorry for being so damn arrogant/rude or w.e but Pay Per Post doesnt really go on too well with the real bloggers..

]]> By: Tom Paine http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-6038 Tom Paine Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:24:27 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-6038 Pay Per Post was never my cup of tea. Sorry for being so damn arrogant/rude or w.e but Pay Per Post doesnt really go on too well with the real bloggers.. Pay Per Post was never my cup of tea. Sorry for being so damn arrogant/rude or w.e but Pay Per Post doesnt really go on too well with the real bloggers..

]]> By: Vlad http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-476 Vlad Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:05:39 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-476 Erica, Thanks for stopping by! Long time since you visited here. :) I completely agree with you on Pay Per Post. There was one huge argument over the disclosure which is not longer valid. But even if an advertiser requires a positive review, so what? It's done every day on TV and other media. Erica,
Thanks for stopping by! Long time since you visited here. :)

I completely agree with you on Pay Per Post. There was one huge argument over the disclosure which is not longer valid. But even if an advertiser requires a positive review, so what? It’s done every day on TV and other media.

]]> By: Erica Forrette http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-475 Erica Forrette Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:31:33 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-475 Yeah.. that was really rude of Arrington! I don't think PayPerPost is evil at all. Most bloggers do not feel compelled to write totally-positive reviews. And even in the blogger code of ethics, PPP says, "PayPerPost itself has no restrictions on how you express your genuine thoughts on an advertiser's product or service" contrary to Arrington saying "they're required to be positive." Yeah.. that was really rude of Arrington! I don’t think PayPerPost is evil at all. Most bloggers do not feel compelled to write totally-positive reviews. And even in the blogger code of ethics, PPP says, “PayPerPost itself has no restrictions on how you express your genuine thoughts on an advertiser’s product or service” contrary to Arrington saying “they’re required to be positive.”

]]> By: Vlad http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-6039 Vlad Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:05:39 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-6039 Erica,<br>Thanks for stopping by! Long time since you visited here. :)<br><br>I completely agree with you on Pay Per Post. There was one huge argument over the disclosure which is not longer valid. But even if an advertiser requires a positive review, so what? It's done every day on TV and other media. Erica,
Thanks for stopping by! Long time since you visited here. :)

I completely agree with you on Pay Per Post. There was one huge argument over the disclosure which is not longer valid. But even if an advertiser requires a positive review, so what? It's done every day on TV and other media.

]]> By: Erica Forrette http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/comment-page-1/#comment-6040 Erica Forrette Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:31:33 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/so-who-is-evil-ted-murphy-or-mike-arrington/#comment-6040 Yeah.. that was really rude of Arrington! I don't think PayPerPost is evil at all. Most bloggers do not feel compelled to write totally-positive reviews. And even in the blogger code of ethics, PPP says, "PayPerPost itself has no restrictions on how you express your genuine thoughts on an advertiser's product or service" contrary to Arrington saying "they're required to be positive." Yeah.. that was really rude of Arrington! I don't think PayPerPost is evil at all. Most bloggers do not feel compelled to write totally-positive reviews. And even in the blogger code of ethics, PPP says, “PayPerPost itself has no restrictions on how you express your genuine thoughts on an advertiser's product or service” contrary to Arrington saying “they're required to be positive.”

]]>