Comments on: Wikipedia’s Nofollow and SEO http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/ Musings About Affiliate Marketing and Blogging Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:57:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ravmhttp://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-12772 ravm Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:13:37 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/#comment-12772 I have often questioned the value of Wikipedia off-site links and this just confirms it. However, a nofollow link from there could still potentially drive traffic to your website, so it may still be worth pursuing as a link building strategy. I have often questioned the value of Wikipedia off-site links and this just confirms it. However, a nofollow link from there could still potentially drive traffic to your website, so it may still be worth pursuing as a link building strategy.

]]> By: KeywordSpy Spam?http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-3643 KeywordSpy Spam? Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:10:29 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/#comment-3643 [...] above comment is the first comment on this blog as well as the content of the original article (Wikipedia’s Nofollow and SEO) I can make a strong argument that the above comment is [...] [...] above comment is the first comment on this blog as well as the content of the original article (Wikipedia’s Nofollow and SEO) I can make a strong argument that the above comment is [...]

]]> By: Es brodelt weiter bei Wikipedia beim nXplorer SEO & Marketing Bloghttp://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1395 Es brodelt weiter bei Wikipedia beim nXplorer SEO & Marketing Blog Sat, 27 Jan 2007 16:19:49 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/#comment-1395 [...] Nachdem en.wikipedia.org in den letzten Tagen wegen des Nofollow Atributs bereits in diversen Blogs unter Beschuss geraten war, scheint es jetzt auch bei de.wikipedia.org zu brodeln. [...] [...] Nachdem en.wikipedia.org in den letzten Tagen wegen des Nofollow Atributs bereits in diversen Blogs unter Beschuss geraten war, scheint es jetzt auch bei de.wikipedia.org zu brodeln. [...]

]]> By: Vladhttp://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1394 Vlad Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:55:54 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/#comment-1394 I was trying to look it up myslef few minutes ago, but their page strength tool is down. Maybe they are already working to adjust this recent change. If I remeber correctly the value of Wikipedia at SEOmoz was quiet big. I believe my blog had about 1000 incoming links according to Yahoo! and SEOmoz attributed only about 20% on their scale. While only one link from Wikipedia would give you a whooping 40% or so. I was trying to look it up myslef few minutes ago, but their page strength tool is down. Maybe they are already working to adjust this recent change. If I remeber correctly the value of Wikipedia at SEOmoz was quiet big. I believe my blog had about 1000 incoming links according to Yahoo! and SEOmoz attributed only about 20% on their scale. While only one link from Wikipedia would give you a whooping 40% or so.

]]> By: Sam Harrelsonhttp://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1393 Sam Harrelson Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:47:58 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/#comment-1393 Good insight. I need to look into the SEOmoz site to see how the nofollow fad could really shake things up. Thanks, Vlad! Good insight.

I need to look into the SEOmoz site to see how the nofollow fad could really shake things up.

Thanks, Vlad!

]]> By: Vladhttp://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-4632 Vlad Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:55:54 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/#comment-4632 I was trying to look it up myslef few minutes ago, but their page strength tool is down. Maybe they are already working to adjust this recent change. If I remeber correctly the value of Wikipedia at SEOmoz was quiet big. I believe my blog had about 1000 incoming links according to Yahoo! and SEOmoz attributed only about 20% on their scale. While only one link from Wikipedia would give you a whooping 40% or so. I was trying to look it up myslef few minutes ago, but their page strength tool is down. Maybe they are already working to adjust this recent change. If I remeber correctly the value of Wikipedia at SEOmoz was quiet big. I believe my blog had about 1000 incoming links according to Yahoo! and SEOmoz attributed only about 20% on their scale. While only one link from Wikipedia would give you a whooping 40% or so.

]]> By: Sam Harrelsonhttp://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-4633 Sam Harrelson Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:47:58 +0000 http://sageblogger.com/wikipedias-nofollow-and-seo/#comment-4633 Good insight.<br><br>I need to look into the SEOmoz site to see how the nofollow fad could really shake things up.<br><br>Thanks, Vlad! Good insight.

I need to look into the SEOmoz site to see how the nofollow fad could really shake things up.

Thanks, Vlad!

]]>